Comments on: The SavyGamer Awards 2010: Results http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/ What're you buying, stranger? Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:08:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.5 By: BigThorsten http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-12318 Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:11:06 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-12318 It seems that in Germany all retailers suck. Last time I went to a GameStop store is was pretty depressing to see what old and expensive stuff they stock.

]]>
By: The Sunday Papers | Rock, Paper, Shotgun http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4751 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:01:40 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4751 […] on the topic of games distribution, the master of the Bargain Bucket, Lewie Procter, has created an awards event for the most bargainous bargain platforms – retail, digital, and miscellaneous – of the […]

]]>
By: Aradiel http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4744 Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:33:34 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4744 In reply to DrGonzo.

“So GAME and HMV are the worst game retailers in the UK. Maybe that’s because they are the only game retailers in the UK?”
They aren’t the only game retailers in the UK – there are also CEX and Grainger games at least.

“So to say one is the best value and one is the worst is pretty stupid too in my opinion.”
Yet that’s how the votes were cast, it’s not like Lewie just decided to say it that way – it could be that the people that voted for GAME being worst value didn’t actually vote for Gamestation as best value.

Your complaints are poorly founded – perhaps if you disagree with the results from voting then maybe you should have voted?

]]>
By: DrGonzo http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4743 Sat, 04 Dec 2010 18:05:51 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4743 In reply to DrGonzo.

Triple post sorry. Also, GAME and Gamestation are the same shop and deliberately price themselves so they both sell certain things cheaper than one another. So to say one is the best value and one is the worst is pretty stupid too in my opinion.

]]>
By: DrGonzo http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4742 Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:55:22 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4742 In reply to DrGonzo.

I also found it strange so many people had bad service from HMV. They have always been pretty excellent for me. HMV even let you return games on the basis that they are shit or buggy, or my favourite – I completed it in one evening and that’s too short, yes they actually gave me a full refund for all those reasons! I don’t know any other game shops that would do that.

]]>
By: DrGonzo http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4741 Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:52:59 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4741 Well I got as far as the first few bits and just thought this was a really stupid list. So GAME and HMV are the worst game retailers in the UK. Maybe that’s because they are the only game retailers in the UK?

]]>
By: Navagon http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4739 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:07:32 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4739 In reply to Efth.

Even if they did it would probably be as much a departure from the series as Conviction was from Splinter Cell.

]]>
By: Navagon http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4738 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:06:37 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4738 Not a lot in there I’d be inclined to disagree with. But I wouldn’t label Valve a publisher. They’re both a multi-studio developer and a distributor but they only self publish, really. Not that I doubt their aptitude, mind.

]]>
By: The Tingler http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4737 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:45:04 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4737 In reply to Diziet.

Yeah, I have to say that the GAME in Oxford has always seemed to avoid most of the horror stories about the store. They’ve even got a large PC section too. Too expensive to shop there, but I do use the online store regularly and never had anything but the best service with it.

]]>
By: Efth http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4736 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:36:24 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4736 As long as Ubisoft doesn’t release a new R6Vegas game, I don’t care about their DRM, because all their new games are shit to begin with.
After they raped Silent Hunter, they defecated on the dead body of Splinter Cell and who knows who is next.
I might just might get ACII one day, but for the console.

I hope they wake the fuck up soon and A)remove this stupid DRM, B)stop making shit games for a quick buck, because at the end that’s what they will end up with, a dollar.

]]>
By: Lewie Procter http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4735 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:29:46 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4735 In reply to Lewie Procter.

Perhaps people would be more tolerant of it if SC2 wasn’t ~50% more expensive than most other PC games.

]]>
By: Mathonar http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4734 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:59:12 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4734 In reply to Lewie Procter.

But the microtransaction stuff in WoW isn’t actually anything other than vanity sutff, it’s not like selling you better game changing items. And some of it has been for charity lets not forget.
I’m more bothered about the slagging for Starcraft 2, yes it’s been split into 3 but it’s not like parts 2 & 3 are just expansions being charged at full price, if they’re the same size each as WoL then that would be pretty fair value.
ALthough, not that it is what i bought if for, i do wonder what parts 2 and 3 will do for multiplayer

]]>
By: StrongBow http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4733 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:21:37 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4733 Yeah, I’d have to say that there was a category missed out “best game deal hunting site” with Savygamer taking 100%. I love this site.

I also agree with the guy about Take 2. Now that I think about it, when I was filling in the form, I had a problem thinking of some.

I know it’s a bit more work, but maybe next year you could pre-fill some with drop down menus that had some names in them, I was filling in steam for online retailers at first till I got further down the page 😀

Thanks as always Lewie, was looking forward to these results 🙂

]]>
By: Mccy_McFlinn http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4732 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:55:48 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4732 In reply to Lewie Procter.

I’d like to add to the thanks. I check the site several times a day – not least because I missed out on Civ 5 for £2.35 (never again!).

An excellent site and, most importantly, a clean and clear one. I’ve seen a couple of sites like it but they’ve been astoundingly ugly and desperate to cram ads in my face. Kudos Lewie and thanks for quoting me rotten in the article above, I’ve now taken to referring to myself as a published writer – which oddly sounds like douchebag when people say it back to me.

]]>
By: Lewie Procter http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4731 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:22:52 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4731 In reply to Sam.

Thanks a lot, I’m glad to be of service.

]]>
By: Lewie Procter http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4730 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:16:27 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4730 In reply to Ben.

I think the point is that they not only charge for the base game, three expansions, subscriptions fees but also have microtransactions. Sure, it’s only because their customers are happy to pay it, but it’s still pretty bad.

]]>
By: Sam http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4729 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:13:20 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4729 I’d like to thank SavyGamer for all of the amazing deals this year, and since it started. It’s one of a very small group of sites that I excitedly check the RSS feed for on Google Reader.

250 unread items? Check SavyGamer, one or two others, then mark all as read. I can’t thank you enough, really!

]]>
By: Lewie Procter http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4728 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:51:37 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4728 In reply to Bruce Rambo.

Thanks for the heads up, but I think The Hut asking me to take down this post would cause worse press than this post itself.

]]>
By: Bruce Rambo http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4727 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:13:37 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4727 Just a warning; for some people logos are serious, serious business and they will hit you with a take down order over your unauthorised use and modification thereof. No, seriously. In fact the Hut group could use this as an valid reason to demand the removal of the entire article, which serves as negative press for them.

Interesting to see confidence in bioware remains high despite the recent nosedive in quality and intelligence of the games. Still fun, no longer epic.

I also suspect the responses on the Hut group are subject to a degree of echo chambering – after all, this IS the site that first pointed out they were fucking around with sales and offers. But despite this, they ARE generally cheap and I do eventually get my games. Yet to actually find a site that has completely up to date stock listings and sent out preorders on time on a regular basis. Play and Amazon also have failed to do so before.

]]>
By: Stanbul http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4726 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:45:47 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4726 The problem with Blizzard isn’t that they are a company trying to make money, its that they do it in a way that’s detrimental to their games. Their ‘solution’ to horrible population and faction imbalances in World of Warcraft? Charge players to transfer. The outcome of this? the problem gets worse and worse, but hey, not to worry, Blizzard’s bank balance is looking good.

]]>
By: Cabbeh http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4725 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:51:48 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4725 I’m a little shocked by Ubisoft Montreal, the only game in recent memory I didn’t like was the Prince Of Persia: The Movie Cash-In title.

Loved everything else, PoP 2008 and Assassin’s Creed II/Brotherhood especially.

]]>
By: Ben http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4724 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:27:07 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4724 I agree with pretty much everything here, except Blizzard being unsavy – Just personal taste, because I love the Diablo series and World of Warcraft and don’t mind paying for either. “They keep doing everything they can to wring money out of WOW players” Hm, almost as if they’re a company looking to make a profit…

]]>
By: Diziet http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4723 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:26:53 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4723 The staff in my local Game are excellent. I keep meaning to compare/contrast the second hand prices with the CEX around the corner but haven’t gotten around to it. Also the customers at the CEX are a scabby bunch which is a real shame.

]]>
By: Herbis http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4722 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:58:32 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4722 I’m sad not to see Take 2 at the top of best publishers.

]]>
By: Adam http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/11/28/the-savygamer-awards-2010-results/#comment-4721 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:55:18 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=8408#comment-4721 I don’t think anyone will be surprised at “the hut group” and “Games for Windows” being unsavy lol.

]]>