17/06/2010 in Reviews
It’s not very good.
Best review ever.
In breach of their Review block – but lets be fair, after playing teh beta you are spot on.
I just read about that. What on earth are they thinking?
SF Legend #
This review is too generous.
Martin Coxall #
You’re off Dave Jones’s Christmas card list forever, sunshine.
This isn’t a review, anyway. It’s got no number.
Yeah, can you include a review score please – I can’t be bothered to read all the words, I always just skip to the score.
Lewie Procter #
sorry, the score is 5/10, +/-5
Paul Moloney #
Wow. Can I suggest either #apbgate or #apbfail as suitable Twitter tags.
Marty Dodge #
Short and to the point. I agree and great review.
You didn’t mention the graphics.
My brother tried to make me play the beta. We played for an hour and I was exposed to dull tedium and the same repetitive action (go to place x, kill some guy lots of times (why not once?), mission over).
The loading screens were like 3 minutes.
It was a very nice GUI, HUD, game engine and graphically very pretty and they could’ve done so much more with it. I was going to pick it up anyway despite the beta being bad because.. well.. it’s a beta. However, I saw you’re expected to pay for the game and THEN subscription. No way.
Played the beta. I loved it personally but whatever.
Best review ever. LP, I <3 you.
You clearly didn’t play it for long enough, biased review
PAY LAV #
I enjoyed the game to be quite honest. just imo.
Haters going to hate.
my guess is the people who like it, liked Age of Conan when it was released, too.
Mail (will not be published) (required)