Comments on: Splinter Cell: Conviction – Review http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/ What're you buying, stranger? Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:40:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.5 By: Auspax http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1613 Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:40:16 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1613 In reply to Spyre.

That’s the pc version. PC games are almost always cheaper than console ones.

]]>
By: Colin http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1612 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:18:59 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1612 In reply to Lewie Procter.

Yeah, I love old SC too, but a series has to evolve otherwise folk will moan

I thought the games was very good
– short, but im loving the deniable ops stuff

And yeah, fraggdolls may be satans whores but who cares?
They didnt make the game

ubi have made mistakes but im not gonna tar them forever

]]>
By: CubaLibre http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1611 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:39:05 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1611 Change the game names and this could almost be a review of Rainbow Six: Vegas.

Maxime Beland, serial franchise murderer.

]]>
By: Spyre http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1610 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:38:02 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1610 You can get the game a lot cheaper here in the UK (£20.99)
http://www.coolshop.co.uk/catalog/product/54869-tom-clancys-splinter-cell–conviction–for-pc

]]>
By: y2rich http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1609 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:32:38 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1609 This is easily the best in yhe series. At least you now have the option to stand and fight rather than it being all out stealth (which is still viable 95% of the time and a necessity on the harder difficulties. This is just a biased review by someone who hates Ubisoft

]]>
By: AtomicB http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1608 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:07:28 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1608 Completely disagree I’m afraid. I’m also a massive fan of the rest of the series, and I enjoyed what this offered as well. Yes, it has been made much more accessible, and yes those insta-fail moments are kind of annoying. However, there’s still great mechanics for you to mess with and master, and this is still very much a mechanics game.

Mark + execute is great. It’s a simple mechanic that’s been applied from the ground up. On the base level, yeah sure just queue up a few guys in front of you and hit the fire button. But there’s so much more you can do with it, i don’t have time to go into it now but there’s lot of hilarious things you can do with it. You can setup great moments, pulling off completely impossible shots, and these moments are your reward for finding the perfect place to position yourself. As for marking people through walls, legit strategy, SC has never worried about being ‘realistic’ it’s just confident enough to wear some of it’s gameplay on it’s sleeve.

M+E, last known position, the indication of when you are hidden, and the suspicion meter gui are all fantastic, way ahead of all it’s rivals. And all of this stuff works just as well if not better in co-op (which you failed to mention at all).

You can still stealth, you can still avoid people (apart from near the end, which is why it’s weaker) and you can still have a great time messing with the ai.

I understand it’s not what you wanted, hey, I loved CT and the other guys too. But this does it’s own thing and it does it well. I think to suggest they’ve made a dumb cash in is a little harsh; just because a lot of things in it a simpler on the surface doesn’t mean they aren’t well crafted.

Amon Tobin did some work for this game too btw, it’s just not as in your face as it was in CT.

]]>
By: Auspax http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1607 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:54:04 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1607 In reply to commentor.

It’s a review of the 360 version so DRM isn’t really the issue.

]]>
By: Red Scharlach http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1606 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:33:41 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1606 In reply to Matthew.

Not his fault UbiSoft are horrible designers and rapists of franchises.

If you want one big happy incestuous family of industry circle-masturbation, you can always check out IGN or GameSpot. That’s what they’re there for.

]]>
By: commentor http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1605 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:48:09 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1605 In reply to Matthew.

What about the DRM stuff? This just looks like a review of a bad game.

]]>
By: Lewie Procter http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1604 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:42:58 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1604 In reply to Matthew.

You know, it’s largely coincidental. I bought this because I love the Splinter Cell series, and I was really hoping for it to be fantastic, it just wasn’t.

I definitely gave it a fair chance, and had it impressed me I would have been just as vocal.

]]>
By: Matthew http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/04/27/splinter-cell-conviction-review/#comment-1603 Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:31:24 +0000 http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=3426#comment-1603 Are you ever going to get bored of panning everything even vaguely related to Ubisoft, just because of a disagreement over the ‘FragDolls’? Because, you know, if that’s the case, I might just stop reading this here blog right about now.

]]>