<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRM Assassination: Let&#8217;s send a message to Ubisoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/</link>
	<description>what&#039;re you buying, stranger?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burton Haynes</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Burton Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://74889in03y637w62f9unf0-3y9.hop.clickbank.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Earn money with CELL PHONE!!!
&lt;/A&gt;i earned in 2 days 30$!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://74889in03y637w62f9unf0-3y9.hop.clickbank.net/" rel="nofollow">Earn money with CELL PHONE!!!<br />
</a>i earned in 2 days 30$!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Boogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Wow, now THAT&#039;s a story a gaming website ought to publish. If only there was access to the reviews that were deleted, though. You think they&#039;d be in google&#039;s archives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, now THAT&#8217;s a story a gaming website ought to publish. If only there was access to the reviews that were deleted, though. You think they&#8217;d be in google&#8217;s archives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Boogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-878</guid>
		<description>It is wrong to assume that if we don&#039;t buy the game then Ubisoft will take this as a sign that either we don&#039;t want the game on the PC, or that the PC market is not worth publishing in anymore. 

If they had a certain amount of sales for previous, similar titles, and now a sequel suddenly has /significantly/ lower sales, people will start to look into why, and I assure you they would not ignore their DRM as a possibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is wrong to assume that if we don&#8217;t buy the game then Ubisoft will take this as a sign that either we don&#8217;t want the game on the PC, or that the PC market is not worth publishing in anymore. </p>
<p>If they had a certain amount of sales for previous, similar titles, and now a sequel suddenly has /significantly/ lower sales, people will start to look into why, and I assure you they would not ignore their DRM as a possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dropbox Linklist &#8211; 23/2/10 &#171; KAECY.US</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Dropbox Linklist &#8211; 23/2/10 &#171; KAECY.US</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-876</guid>
		<description>[...] SavyGamer have taken up a scheme which, for the cost of 90p shipping and a little bit of time, you can stand up against restrictive DRM. I say bring back Disc [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SavyGamer have taken up a scheme which, for the cost of 90p shipping and a little bit of time, you can stand up against restrictive DRM. I say bring back Disc [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aradiel</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Aradiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s look at the options we have open to us:

1) Buy the game - it shows that they can get away with this nonsense
2) Pirate the game - it proves they are right
3) Buy it on a console - Shows that we just aren&#039;t interested on the PC, or that PC gamers don&#039;t want it in general.
4) Boycott the game - They will be looking at sales figures and piracy figures, not abstentions.
5) Write a letter - As pointed out above, letters will be ignored or ineffective
6) Go through with Lewie&#039;s idea - Actually registering our disgust in a way that they might pay attention to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s look at the options we have open to us:</p>
<p>1) Buy the game &#8211; it shows that they can get away with this nonsense<br />
2) Pirate the game &#8211; it proves they are right<br />
3) Buy it on a console &#8211; Shows that we just aren&#8217;t interested on the PC, or that PC gamers don&#8217;t want it in general.<br />
4) Boycott the game &#8211; They will be looking at sales figures and piracy figures, not abstentions.<br />
5) Write a letter &#8211; As pointed out above, letters will be ignored or ineffective<br />
6) Go through with Lewie&#8217;s idea &#8211; Actually registering our disgust in a way that they might pay attention to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jago</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-851</guid>
		<description>The Play.com Nazis have deleted all the reviews for Assassin&#039;s Creed 2 on the PC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Play.com Nazis have deleted all the reviews for Assassin&#8217;s Creed 2 on the PC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K405</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>K405</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Tesco?  Never once heard of them.  Might be a good idea to pick something higher profile, like Amazon or Gamestop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tesco?  Never once heard of them.  Might be a good idea to pick something higher profile, like Amazon or Gamestop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacQ</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>MacQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-836</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think any letter (physical or digital) will matter. They&#039;ll just toss them.

The only thing that matters to these people is the money. They can show the sales from the returns if they want, but in the end they won&#039;t see the money from them. And that will get them thinking more then a letter which they won&#039;t even look at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think any letter (physical or digital) will matter. They&#8217;ll just toss them.</p>
<p>The only thing that matters to these people is the money. They can show the sales from the returns if they want, but in the end they won&#8217;t see the money from them. And that will get them thinking more then a letter which they won&#8217;t even look at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rugged Malone</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Rugged Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-835</guid>
		<description>My concern is that the number of returns will be ignored and all your campaign will do is pad the number of sales, proving the DRM has no impact.

A better approach would be to write a (physical) letter to Ubisoft explaining that you would like to buy this game but refuse to because of the DRM.

Do NOT say that you will pirate it, simply state that although you really wanted to buy this game, the DRM is offensive and you refuse to support any company that uses that.

I wasn&#039;t going to buy AC2, but &#039;m planning to do this for SH5.

Minimal cost to the individual, but if enough people do this, it can definitely get their attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern is that the number of returns will be ignored and all your campaign will do is pad the number of sales, proving the DRM has no impact.</p>
<p>A better approach would be to write a (physical) letter to Ubisoft explaining that you would like to buy this game but refuse to because of the DRM.</p>
<p>Do NOT say that you will pirate it, simply state that although you really wanted to buy this game, the DRM is offensive and you refuse to support any company that uses that.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to buy AC2, but &#8216;m planning to do this for SH5.</p>
<p>Minimal cost to the individual, but if enough people do this, it can definitely get their attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Paddon</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Paddon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Brilliant idea. If I still lived in the UK I&#039;d definitely get in on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant idea. If I still lived in the UK I&#8217;d definitely get in on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ral</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>ral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Simply not buying the game on PC only gives Ubi the excuse to say that the PC has become a nonprofitable platform for investment.
The above outlined course of action is a decent one, IMO, with the only major flaw of Ubisoft as a corporation cherry-picking the numbers and statistics that they feel like looking at or reporting.  I also think that pre-orders should be canceled at the latest possible date for those of us in the states with less amicable return rules, to potentially stick retailers with far more copies in-warehouse than they planned on.  I also think that people should stop buying Ubisoft games on consoles; however, getting console gamers to to do anything for the sake of gaming as a hobby at large is next to impossible if their platform of choice isn&#039;t at risk.  Relatedly, I think that if Ubisoft games were suddenly taken off of everyone&#039;s Gamefly queues, it would send a similar message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply not buying the game on PC only gives Ubi the excuse to say that the PC has become a nonprofitable platform for investment.<br />
The above outlined course of action is a decent one, IMO, with the only major flaw of Ubisoft as a corporation cherry-picking the numbers and statistics that they feel like looking at or reporting.  I also think that pre-orders should be canceled at the latest possible date for those of us in the states with less amicable return rules, to potentially stick retailers with far more copies in-warehouse than they planned on.  I also think that people should stop buying Ubisoft games on consoles; however, getting console gamers to to do anything for the sake of gaming as a hobby at large is next to impossible if their platform of choice isn&#8217;t at risk.  Relatedly, I think that if Ubisoft games were suddenly taken off of everyone&#8217;s Gamefly queues, it would send a similar message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this&#124; XboxSold.com where you find Everything Xbox&#124; XboxSold.com BLOG</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this&#124; XboxSold.com where you find Everything Xbox&#124; XboxSold.com BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-826</guid>
		<description>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jago</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Jago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Check out the customer ratings on Play:

http://www.play.com/Games/PC/4-/9606606/Assassin-Creed-II/Product.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the customer ratings on Play:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.play.com/Games/PC/4-/9606606/Assassin-Creed-II/Product.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.play.com/Games/PC/4-/9606606/Assassin-Creed-II/Product.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacQ</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>MacQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-823</guid>
		<description>I fully support the idea, but I&#039;m not from the UK, and therefore I won&#039;t be ordering a game for which I have to pay like 4 EUR to return.

Don&#039;t they email you when you preorder so that you confirm the order one the game is out? That would be great, &#039;cause then I could preorder it and cancel the order when I get the email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully support the idea, but I&#8217;m not from the UK, and therefore I won&#8217;t be ordering a game for which I have to pay like 4 EUR to return.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t they email you when you preorder so that you confirm the order one the game is out? That would be great, &#8217;cause then I could preorder it and cancel the order when I get the email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this &#124; NewsSlots.com</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this &#124; NewsSlots.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-822</guid>
		<description>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this&#124; Latest breaking News on Video Games Hardware and Software.&#124; BadPower.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this&#124; Latest breaking News on Video Games Hardware and Software.&#124; BadPower.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-821</guid>
		<description>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad as hell about Ubisoft&#8217;s DRM? Try this</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-820</guid>
		<description>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the protest boils down to buying Assassin&#8217;e Creed 2 PC (or Settlers 7) en masse, then returning it for a full refund, loudly making it known that the DRM was the primary reason for the return. Retailers are obligated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrDark</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>DrDark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-819</guid>
		<description>That&#039;d be a wonderful thing, but unfortunately it&#039;d never happen.

Personally, I&#039;m boycotting all Ubisoft product, not just PC (although I&#039;ll be taking part in this plan of attack). I actually started by boycotting Activision&#039;s stuff late last year, around the same time all their MW2 bullsh*t and related articles all started appearing. 

I think all else we can do is an all out assault using Amazon, Tesco, online blogs etc, and just tweeting about how crap it is as much as possible. Although the best case scenario would be that AC2 (and SettlersVII) is released with the DRM, then patched out later and scrapped from future releases, as it&#039;s likely too far along to take it out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;d be a wonderful thing, but unfortunately it&#8217;d never happen.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m boycotting all Ubisoft product, not just PC (although I&#8217;ll be taking part in this plan of attack). I actually started by boycotting Activision&#8217;s stuff late last year, around the same time all their MW2 bullsh*t and related articles all started appearing. </p>
<p>I think all else we can do is an all out assault using Amazon, Tesco, online blogs etc, and just tweeting about how crap it is as much as possible. Although the best case scenario would be that AC2 (and SettlersVII) is released with the DRM, then patched out later and scrapped from future releases, as it&#8217;s likely too far along to take it out now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grubblik</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Grubblik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-818</guid>
		<description>Lewie is a link? oh you must have meant &#039;your&#039;. If you&#039;re gonna flame at least use the correct words, here&#039;s a big fat go learn some grammar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lewie is a link? oh you must have meant &#8216;your&#8217;. If you&#8217;re gonna flame at least use the correct words, here&#8217;s a big fat go learn some grammar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-817</guid>
		<description>And risk losing the back-handers they get from the publishers to give their big new blockbuster a rave review, regardless of its actual quality? Not likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And risk losing the back-handers they get from the publishers to give their big new blockbuster a rave review, regardless of its actual quality? Not likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freman</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Freman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Just crack the game, remove the DRM, and play like normal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just crack the game, remove the DRM, and play like normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>KBoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Another fight we could put up, and which is perhaps the most drastic of all options, is a psychological attack. We simply ignore Ubisoft. We ignore Assissin&#039;s Creed2, and Settlers, and any game they release. And by we, I mean the PC community as a whole. This will include reviewers and magazines, too. Imagine if all of a sudden everyone but the odd small website and blog starts to completely ignore anything by Ubisoft and completely shuns them. No mention whatsoever, not even of the shunning itself. Now that would be an effective message right there. It would greatly impact them because all these websites and magazines are very important to marketting. And if this pushes them over the edge and they give up with PCs entirely, then as someone has already mentioned; good riddance. Let them take their shite elsewhere.

That&#039;s an unfeasible plan, though. It involves having websites and magazines that make money on these articles and reviews to intentionally reduce their profits. And I don&#039;t know about every website and magazine, but most are run by companies and managed by boards that are just like the game publishers. They&#039;d never agree to something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another fight we could put up, and which is perhaps the most drastic of all options, is a psychological attack. We simply ignore Ubisoft. We ignore Assissin&#8217;s Creed2, and Settlers, and any game they release. And by we, I mean the PC community as a whole. This will include reviewers and magazines, too. Imagine if all of a sudden everyone but the odd small website and blog starts to completely ignore anything by Ubisoft and completely shuns them. No mention whatsoever, not even of the shunning itself. Now that would be an effective message right there. It would greatly impact them because all these websites and magazines are very important to marketting. And if this pushes them over the edge and they give up with PCs entirely, then as someone has already mentioned; good riddance. Let them take their shite elsewhere.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an unfeasible plan, though. It involves having websites and magazines that make money on these articles and reviews to intentionally reduce their profits. And I don&#8217;t know about every website and magazine, but most are run by companies and managed by boards that are just like the game publishers. They&#8217;d never agree to something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>KBoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-813</guid>
		<description>All these shareholders are usually wealthy market players or hopeful white-collared blokes that went to the wrong advisory agency. The chances that any of them actually give a rat&#039;s arse about the games&#039; quality is little. What they care about is the return on their investment, their dividends. And so when the chairman of the board shows them a slide explaining how DRM will increase profits by decreasing number of units pirated and, by correlation, increases the units sold, that will be enough for them. 
And of course it doesn&#039;t matter that DRM rarely stops piracy, because the board will never show THOSE numbers to the public. And the only truly knowledgeable ones and those that care are just a small minority who&#039;s combined vote is a tiny fraction of the hundreds of thousands of shares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these shareholders are usually wealthy market players or hopeful white-collared blokes that went to the wrong advisory agency. The chances that any of them actually give a rat&#8217;s arse about the games&#8217; quality is little. What they care about is the return on their investment, their dividends. And so when the chairman of the board shows them a slide explaining how DRM will increase profits by decreasing number of units pirated and, by correlation, increases the units sold, that will be enough for them.<br />
And of course it doesn&#8217;t matter that DRM rarely stops piracy, because the board will never show THOSE numbers to the public. And the only truly knowledgeable ones and those that care are just a small minority who&#8217;s combined vote is a tiny fraction of the hundreds of thousands of shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squirrel</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Squirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-812</guid>
		<description>All these publishers are usually public companies, what kind of say do shareholders get?  Is it as easy for an executive to ignore a letter from a shareholder rather than a member of public?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these publishers are usually public companies, what kind of say do shareholders get?  Is it as easy for an executive to ignore a letter from a shareholder rather than a member of public?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>KBoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-811</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t quite see how user submitted scores on Amazon affect anything, but that&#039;s because I don&#039;t shop for games on Amazon. Phil does bring up a good point that it [i]could[/i] be picked up by some kind of news outlet.

However, I don&#039;t think we should focus on just one venue. We should all do as much as possible to fight back. Tesco, Metacritic, Amazon, anything and everything. The more the better. And by spreading it wide, the effect will loop back onto itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite see how user submitted scores on Amazon affect anything, but that&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t shop for games on Amazon. Phil does bring up a good point that it [i]could[/i] be picked up by some kind of news outlet.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think we should focus on just one venue. We should all do as much as possible to fight back. Tesco, Metacritic, Amazon, anything and everything. The more the better. And by spreading it wide, the effect will loop back onto itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Low reviews on Amazon due to DRM would be far more effective, it also tends to get news coverage on several news websites as well as blogs far more so than sending back to a particular retailer. We&#039;d also do well to make sure sites such as Megacritic etc have low reviews due to DRM, user reviews matter these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Low reviews on Amazon due to DRM would be far more effective, it also tends to get news coverage on several news websites as well as blogs far more so than sending back to a particular retailer. We&#8217;d also do well to make sure sites such as Megacritic etc have low reviews due to DRM, user reviews matter these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bowlby</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowlby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Also, isn&#039;t another idea to go on Amazon and bombard them with one-star reviews?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, isn&#8217;t another idea to go on Amazon and bombard them with one-star reviews?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>KBoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-808</guid>
		<description>If you really want to pass a message to Ubisoft, there is a far easier way to do this than annoying one retail outlet. Metacritic is, unfortunately, something that game companies use very often. Heck, I&#039;ve seen job offerings where one of the requirements was shipment of a game with a metacritic score of over 90. So rather than getting a hundred people to play bait and switch with Tesco, here is what you do:

Go to Metacritic. Look up Assassin&#039;s Creed&#039;s reviews and jot down the websites of the reviewers there. There are lots, so get all the big names, but also the other ones that have given the game a high score. Now compile a list of the emails of all the editors of those websites/magazines and have the hundred people email [i]them[/i] about second game. And be adamant that in the email it is [b]clearly mentioned why the effect of the DRM [i]should[/i] influence the final score of the game, and not simply mentioned in the review with a sad smiley.[/b]

If a large enough population of the reviewers are influenced, and agree, and their reviews carry a lower score because of the DRM, and it is clear in the review that the DRM was the cause of the score lowering, then that would be a far stronger message to Ubisoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you really want to pass a message to Ubisoft, there is a far easier way to do this than annoying one retail outlet. Metacritic is, unfortunately, something that game companies use very often. Heck, I&#8217;ve seen job offerings where one of the requirements was shipment of a game with a metacritic score of over 90. So rather than getting a hundred people to play bait and switch with Tesco, here is what you do:</p>
<p>Go to Metacritic. Look up Assassin&#8217;s Creed&#8217;s reviews and jot down the websites of the reviewers there. There are lots, so get all the big names, but also the other ones that have given the game a high score. Now compile a list of the emails of all the editors of those websites/magazines and have the hundred people email [i]them[/i] about second game. And be adamant that in the email it is [b]clearly mentioned why the effect of the DRM [i]should[/i] influence the final score of the game, and not simply mentioned in the review with a sad smiley.[/b]</p>
<p>If a large enough population of the reviewers are influenced, and agree, and their reviews carry a lower score because of the DRM, and it is clear in the review that the DRM was the cause of the score lowering, then that would be a far stronger message to Ubisoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bowlby</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowlby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-807</guid>
		<description>I really think the intentions behind this idea are admirable, but I just don&#039;t think people will be arsed to follow it through. I mean, I hate what Ubisoft are doing with their DRM; I&#039;ve written about it, even. You know what, though? I&#039;m still not going to do it, because I&#039;m a bit of a lazy sod that way.

I still think the best way of making a protest is by simply not buying the game on the PC platform. If sales for AC2 on the PC actually turn out to be less than for the original, then they&#039;ve simply got to give their DRM a second look. They&#039;d have to be extremely bloody-minded not to.

My theory, though, is that they are that bloody-minded. They don&#039;t care about what people think, and the sales are going to poor, and they&#039;ll just say &quot;Look, piracy!&quot; and stop publishing their games on the PC – which, really, is what they&#039;ve been wanting to do for a while. 

If there are only two options here – of Ubisoft either releasing games with this fascist DRM or getting out of the market altogether – I&#039;d rather see them doing the latter. Good-fucking-riddence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think the intentions behind this idea are admirable, but I just don&#8217;t think people will be arsed to follow it through. I mean, I hate what Ubisoft are doing with their DRM; I&#8217;ve written about it, even. You know what, though? I&#8217;m still not going to do it, because I&#8217;m a bit of a lazy sod that way.</p>
<p>I still think the best way of making a protest is by simply not buying the game on the PC platform. If sales for AC2 on the PC actually turn out to be less than for the original, then they&#8217;ve simply got to give their DRM a second look. They&#8217;d have to be extremely bloody-minded not to.</p>
<p>My theory, though, is that they are that bloody-minded. They don&#8217;t care about what people think, and the sales are going to poor, and they&#8217;ll just say &#8220;Look, piracy!&#8221; and stop publishing their games on the PC – which, really, is what they&#8217;ve been wanting to do for a while. </p>
<p>If there are only two options here – of Ubisoft either releasing games with this fascist DRM or getting out of the market altogether – I&#8217;d rather see them doing the latter. Good-fucking-riddence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewie Procter</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewie Procter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-806</guid>
		<description>There is no right or wrong way to pronounce/interperate it ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no right or wrong way to pronounce/interperate it ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>KBoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t tell me you actually believe that the promise of patching out DRM is anything more than empty air. Think of how many games that require internet connection (through being inherently multiplayer) EA has killed in the past by pulling the plug on their servers, without any patches or releasing dedicated servers to the public. Just a few days ago EA closed down servers for Mercs2 and LotR:Conquest. Those games were barely a year old. Those games were [i]multiplayer[/i] games. Assassin&#039;s Creed and Settlers and a lot of Ubisoft&#039;s games are singleplayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t tell me you actually believe that the promise of patching out DRM is anything more than empty air. Think of how many games that require internet connection (through being inherently multiplayer) EA has killed in the past by pulling the plug on their servers, without any patches or releasing dedicated servers to the public. Just a few days ago EA closed down servers for Mercs2 and LotR:Conquest. Those games were barely a year old. Those games were [i]multiplayer[/i] games. Assassin&#8217;s Creed and Settlers and a lot of Ubisoft&#8217;s games are singleplayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cry some more</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Cry some more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-804</guid>
		<description>This plan sucks. Try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This plan sucks. Try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>KBoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-803</guid>
		<description>No exec will ever get any email or scrap of paper delivered to their desk. All your emails go through a filtering process, either automated or done by some poor intern bloke that files them under &quot;abusive&quot;, &quot;threatening&quot;, &quot;nonsensical&quot;, etc. They are then forwarded to yet more intern blokes in the HR department who have explicit instructions on how to deal with each type of email. Most are ignored. Others are answered with automated templates in the likeness of &quot;We are glad to hear from you and appreciate that you have opinions. But we just don&#039;t give a shit.&quot; 

If for whatever reason an exec would be willing to read through negative &quot;fan mail&quot;, the head of HR (or someone appointed by the head of HR) would then pick the most mild-mannered and grammatically correct of the bunch. So what the exec ultimately reads is a self-apologetic, long-winded, and ultimately ineffectual expression of mild dissatisfaction by a mildly unhappy customer (and likely one on a topic completely irrelevant).

And then gamers ask why it seems like game companies don&#039;t seem like they even know what gamers want. (They know what the numbers show them, and in the business world the numbers don&#039;t lie). It is because there is simply no communication between publishers and gamers. There isn&#039;t even any communication between the publisher and the game they are publishing. What, you think they actually play the games they publish? You think companies publishing porn movies actually watch what they publish? It&#039;s a business, and you don&#039;t have to necessarily like the line of work to do business. And I can assure you that there are plenty of execs in game publishing companies that look down on games the way they&#039;d look down at porn. They only do their business with the numbers, and stay away from the product as far as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No exec will ever get any email or scrap of paper delivered to their desk. All your emails go through a filtering process, either automated or done by some poor intern bloke that files them under &#8220;abusive&#8221;, &#8220;threatening&#8221;, &#8220;nonsensical&#8221;, etc. They are then forwarded to yet more intern blokes in the HR department who have explicit instructions on how to deal with each type of email. Most are ignored. Others are answered with automated templates in the likeness of &#8220;We are glad to hear from you and appreciate that you have opinions. But we just don&#8217;t give a shit.&#8221; </p>
<p>If for whatever reason an exec would be willing to read through negative &#8220;fan mail&#8221;, the head of HR (or someone appointed by the head of HR) would then pick the most mild-mannered and grammatically correct of the bunch. So what the exec ultimately reads is a self-apologetic, long-winded, and ultimately ineffectual expression of mild dissatisfaction by a mildly unhappy customer (and likely one on a topic completely irrelevant).</p>
<p>And then gamers ask why it seems like game companies don&#8217;t seem like they even know what gamers want. (They know what the numbers show them, and in the business world the numbers don&#8217;t lie). It is because there is simply no communication between publishers and gamers. There isn&#8217;t even any communication between the publisher and the game they are publishing. What, you think they actually play the games they publish? You think companies publishing porn movies actually watch what they publish? It&#8217;s a business, and you don&#8217;t have to necessarily like the line of work to do business. And I can assure you that there are plenty of execs in game publishing companies that look down on games the way they&#8217;d look down at porn. They only do their business with the numbers, and stay away from the product as far as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoogle</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>KBoogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-802</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the way I always looked at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the way I always looked at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helis</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Helis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-801</guid>
		<description>COME, GET ON THE BANDWAGON! WE MUST PUSH LITTLE CART!

Spread the word, NAO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COME, GET ON THE BANDWAGON! WE MUST PUSH LITTLE CART!</p>
<p>Spread the word, NAO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomte</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-800</guid>
		<description>&quot; ... they are refusing to 100% commit to supporting these games in the future. You may be left with a coaster.&quot;
While this is true, they also commented this by saying that they are able to patch the DRM out of the games in question if they ever do decide to bring those servers down permanently for whatever reason, and that that&#039;s a patch they&#039;d be willing to release in such an event. 

I agree with the rest of your points however. But my plan of action will be simple, I won&#039;t buy the game. I might pirate it just because of this anti-piracy attempt however.... We&#039;ll see. These nazi-manners kinda always backfire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; &#8230; they are refusing to 100% commit to supporting these games in the future. You may be left with a coaster.&#8221;<br />
While this is true, they also commented this by saying that they are able to patch the DRM out of the games in question if they ever do decide to bring those servers down permanently for whatever reason, and that that&#8217;s a patch they&#8217;d be willing to release in such an event. </p>
<p>I agree with the rest of your points however. But my plan of action will be simple, I won&#8217;t buy the game. I might pirate it just because of this anti-piracy attempt however&#8230;. We&#8217;ll see. These nazi-manners kinda always backfire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilgamefreek</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>lilgamefreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I whole heartedly agree. I was completely on board until you mentioned the retailer should be tesco, which gave me a pause until I realized it was UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I whole heartedly agree. I was completely on board until you mentioned the retailer should be tesco, which gave me a pause until I realized it was UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sunday Papers &#124; Rock, Paper, Shotgun</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sunday Papers &#124; Rock, Paper, Shotgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-798</guid>
		<description>[...] This is interesting. Savygamer get a little militant about the Ubisoft situation, and is trying to organise a mass-order-and-return from a retailer who currently doesn&#8217;t have it on their listing that it requires a connection. Do go read, because it&#8217;s a fascinating example of how strong the response is to this one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is interesting. Savygamer get a little militant about the Ubisoft situation, and is trying to organise a mass-order-and-return from a retailer who currently doesn&#8217;t have it on their listing that it requires a connection. Do go read, because it&#8217;s a fascinating example of how strong the response is to this one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vdbswong</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>vdbswong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-797</guid>
		<description>TBH I think Amazon would be a much better choice of retailer since you could make it an international &quot;petition&quot; as opposed to just a UK one. This would then result in better exposure and (hopefully) results.

+ AFAIK, Amazon don&#039;t have any mention of the DRM and/or Internet Connection requirements in their product page (apart from the comments section).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBH I think Amazon would be a much better choice of retailer since you could make it an international &#8220;petition&#8221; as opposed to just a UK one. This would then result in better exposure and (hopefully) results.</p>
<p>+ AFAIK, Amazon don&#8217;t have any mention of the DRM and/or Internet Connection requirements in their product page (apart from the comments section).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandrill</title>
		<link>http://savygamer.co.uk/2010/02/19/drm-assassination-lets-send-a-message-to-ubisoft/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>mandrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savygamer.co.uk/?p=2507#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Agreed, and I used to work there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, and I used to work there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
